🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing damages totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct response by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to determine later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is legally sound. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal actions, including seizing European corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in European nations are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if such holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are developing steps to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense damage caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."