🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image circulated by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a tailor-made version of the president. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series launched last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative rather than debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the Putin cult by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is shown as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with him to accept the role. The position was effectively a selection process with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of him as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on city centers, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the authorities will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.